Lộ trìnhTracks Sản phẩmProducts HãngBrands Thuật ngữGlossary Kiểm traQuiz ChecklistChecklist 7 ngày7 days Chọn lộ trình phù hợpChoose your path
Lộ trình đang họcCurrent track
Tấm pin quang điệnPhotovoltaic panels
Về lộ trìnhTrack home

Tấm pin quang điệnPhotovoltaic panels · BàiLesson 2/7

Photovoltaic Cell Technology

Dành cho:For: technicians and newcomers who need to understand panel technology, and sales staff who need to explain why a more expensive back-contact panel is worth it.
Trong bàiOn this page
Tấm pin quang điện · 02-02Photovoltaic panels · 02-02
Solar Knowledge Hub

Công nghệ tế bào quang điệnPhotovoltaic cell technology

Hai tấm cùng công suất có thể khác nhau hẳn về hiệu suất, độ bền và chịu nóng: khác biệt đó nằm ở công nghệ tế bào bên trong.Two panels of the same rated power can differ greatly in efficiency, durability, and heat tolerance: the difference lies in cell technology.

1 Loại N vs Loại P: khác biệt cốt lõiN-type vs P-type: core difference
Silic loại P (pha bo)P-type silicon (boron-doped)
Bo + Oxy
Tổ hợp bo-oxy dưới ánh sángBoron-oxygen pairs under light
Suy giảm do ánh sáng vĩnh viễn; hệ số nhiệt kém hơn.Permanent light-induced degradation; worse temperature coefficient.
vs
Silic loại N (pha phốt pho)N-type silicon (phosphorus-doped)
Không LID
Không tạo tổ hợp bo-oxyNo boron-oxygen pairs
Gần như tránh được suy giảm kiểu bo-oxy; hệ số nhiệt tốt hơn.Avoids boron-oxygen degradation; better temperature coefficient.
2 Bốn công nghệ tế bào: hiệu suất và chịu nóngFour cell technologies: efficiency and heat
Công nghệTechnologyLoại silicSilicon typeHiệu suất moduleModule efficiencyHệ số nhiệtTemp coefficientVị tríPosition
PERCPERCLoại PP-type20.5–22%20.5–22%−0.34 đến −0.35%/°C−0.34 to −0.35%/°CThế hệ cũOlder generation
TOPConTOPConLoại NN-type22–23.5%22–23.5%−0.29 đến −0.30%/°C−0.29 to −0.30%/°CPhổ biến nhấtMost common
HJTHJTLoại NN-type22.5–24%22.5–24%−0.24 đến −0.26%/°C−0.24 to −0.26%/°CChịu nóng tốt nhấtBest heat tolerance
Back-contact (IBC, ABC)Back-contact (IBC, ABC)Loại NN-type23.5–gần 25%23.5–near 25%khoảng −0.26%/°Cabout −0.26%/°CHiệu suất cao nhấtHighest efficiency
3 Vì sao back-contact nổi bậtWhy back-contact stands out
Mặt trước không che bóngNo shading busbars on front
Toàn bộ busbar và điện cực dời ra mặt sau, thu được nhiều ánh sáng hơn.All busbars and electrodes move to the rear, more light captured.
Thẩm mỹ đen đồng nhấtUniform black appearance
Mặt trước đen toàn phần, đẹp cho mái nhìn thấy như nhà phố và biệt thự.All-black front surface: ideal for visible roofs on townhouses and villas.
Chịu nóng nhờ hệ số nhiệtHeat tolerance via temperature coefficient
Mát hơn chủ yếu do hệ số nhiệt ưu việt ~−0.26%/°C, không phải hệ quả cơ học của việc ít che bóng.Runs cooler mainly from its superior temp coefficient ~−0.26%/°C, not a direct mechanical result of less shading.
Hiệu suất cao nhất thị trườngHighest market efficiency
Module thương mại đạt 23.5 tới gần 25 phần trăm, cùng mái lắp được nhiều watt hơn.Commercial modules reach 23.5 to near 25%: more watts on the same roof.
Ghi nhớ cho SalesFor Sales

Ba điểm bán tấm AIKO back-contact: hiệu suất cao nhất (cùng diện tích mái lắp được nhiều watt hơn), mặt trước đẹp (đen đồng nhất cho mái nhìn thấy) và chịu nóng tốt (hệ số nhiệt ưu việt, hợp khí hậu Việt Nam). Tránh giải thích sai rằng tấm mát chỉ vì ít che bóng.Three selling points for AIKO back-contact: highest efficiency (more watts, same roof), best aesthetics (uniform black front), good heat tolerance (superior temperature coefficient for Vietnam's climate). Avoid saying the panel runs cooler simply because of less shading, that's the wrong mechanism.

Nguồn: Solar N Plus · Schmidt 2020 (Wiley) · SurgePV · Clean Energy Reviews (back-contact 24.8–25.4%) · Raylyst · AIKO · InfoLink · ITRPV (N-type ~66% thị phần 2024) · FuturaSun.Sources: Solar N Plus · Schmidt 2020 (Wiley) · SurgePV · Clean Energy Reviews (back-contact 24.8–25.4%) · Raylyst · AIKO · InfoLink · ITRPV (N-type ~66% market share 2024) · FuturaSun. Đã kiểm chứng đa nguồnMulti-source verified

Two panels with identical rated power can differ significantly in efficiency, durability, and heat tolerance, and that difference comes down to the cell technology inside. This article explains the distinction between N-type and P-type silicon, then walks through the four mainstream cell technologies from the older PERC to the latest back-contact designs, giving you enough understanding to choose the right technology for each application.

For: technicians and newcomers who need to understand panel technology, and sales staff who need to explain why a more expensive back-contact panel is worth it.


Quick summary

N-type silicon is more durable and handles heat better than P-type because it does not suffer from boron-oxygen light-induced degradation. Most premium panels today are N-type.

The four cell technologies ranked by efficiency are: PERC (older generation), TOPCon (current mainstream), HJT (best heat tolerance), and back-contact variants such as IBC and ABC, which deliver the highest efficiency.

Back-contact panels move all electrodes to the rear, leaving the front face completely free of shading busbars, both aesthetically cleaner and better at capturing light. They also handle heat well thanks to a superior temperature coefficient, not merely because of reduced shading.


N-type vs P-type silicon

Photovoltaic cells are made from silicon doped with impurities to enable conduction, and the choice of dopant determines which of two base types a cell belongs to. P-type is doped with boron; N-type is doped with phosphorus. This small difference leads to two significant consequences.

The first consequence is durability. In P-type silicon, boron combines with oxygen present in the crystal lattice under illumination, forming boron-oxygen complexes that cause permanent power loss, a phenomenon known as light-induced degradation (LID). N-type silicon doped with phosphorus does not form these complexes, so it is largely immune to this type of degradation and retains output better over time.

The second consequence is heat tolerance. N-type silicon has a longer minority-carrier lifetime and lower recombination rates, which translates to a better temperature coefficient, meaning it loses less power as temperature rises. This is why N-type panels are well suited to hot climates like Vietnam’s, a point that connects directly to article 02-04.


The four cell technologies

Within the modern panel family, four cell technologies are distinguished by their surface passivation approach and electrode placement.

PERC is the older P-type technology, with module efficiency in the range of 20.5 to 22%, a temperature coefficient of approximately −0.34 to −0.35%/°C, and susceptibility to light-induced degradation. This is the generation being gradually phased out.

TOPCon is currently the most widely used N-type technology. It adds a thin oxide layer and a polycrystalline silicon layer on the rear surface to reduce electron recombination. Module efficiency runs from 22 to 23.5%, with a temperature coefficient of approximately −0.29 to −0.30%/°C and low degradation. The majority of JA Solar and Jinko panels on the market belong to this category.

HJT is an N-type technology that combines crystalline silicon with amorphous silicon thin films, achieving the best temperature coefficient of any mainstream technology at approximately −0.24 to −0.26%/°C and very low degradation. The trade-off is a higher price.

Back-contact (including IBC and AIKO’s ABC variant) moves all electrodes to the rear of the cell. These achieve the highest module efficiency currently available, in the range of 23.5 to 24.5% (the highest mass-market products reach about 24.2%, e.g. AIKO ABC 655W; close to 25% only in rare premium lines), with a temperature coefficient of approximately −0.26%/°C. The trade-off is the highest cost.

TechnologyModule efficiencyTemperature coefficientMarket position
PERC (P-type)20.5 – 22%−0.34 to −0.35%/°COlder generation
TOPCon (N-type)22 – 23.5%−0.29 to −0.30%/°CCurrent mainstream
HJT (N-type)22.5 – 24%−0.24 to −0.26%/°CBest heat tolerance
Back-contact IBC, ABC (N-type)23.5 – 24.5%approx. −0.26%/°CHighest efficiency

Why back-contact stands out

The defining characteristic of back-contact panels is a completely unobstructed front face. Conventional panels have busbars running across the front surface to collect current, and these busbars shade a portion of the cell area. Back-contact designs move all busbars and electrodes to the rear, eliminating front-side shading, capturing more light, and producing the uniform black appearance that is aesthetically desirable on visible roof sections.

A point worth stating precisely concerns heat performance. Some materials describe a direct causal chain in which less shading leads to higher efficiency, which in turn leads to lower operating temperature. In reality, back-contact panels run cooler primarily because of their superior temperature coefficient (approximately −0.26%/°C), not as a mechanical consequence of reduced shading. The two benefits are independent, and stating this correctly prevents a misunderstanding of the underlying mechanism.

Sales takeaway

When a customer asks why an AIKO back-contact panel costs more than a standard panel, three accurate selling points are: highest efficiency means more watts from the same roof area; a uniform black front face looks better on visible roofs; and excellent heat tolerance makes it well suited to Vietnam’s climate. Avoid claiming the panel runs cooler simply because of less shading, as that is an incorrect explanation of the mechanism.

Sources & verification

N-type silicon’s avoidance of boron-oxygen degradation is supported by Solar N Plus and Schmidt 2020 (Wiley). PERC, TOPCon, HJT, and back-contact characteristics (including efficiency ranges and temperature coefficients) are drawn from SurgePV and Clean Energy Reviews, with commercial back-contact modules reaching 24.8 to 25.4% per Clean Energy Reviews. The ABC temperature coefficient of approximately −0.26%/°C is sourced from Raylyst and AIKO. N-type accounted for approximately 66% of 2024 market share per InfoLink and ITRPV. The causal-chain correction on temperature behavior is based on verification findings and FuturaSun.